OpenID Shared Signals · DADE Event Profile 1.0 draft 00

DADE Event Reference

Every event in the Death and the Digital Estate profile: what triggers it, who sends it, what is in the payload, and what a Receiver can do about it. These events describe the legal status of a person and the authority others hold over their affairs. They carry facts, not their legal consequences: the same transition has materially different effects in different jurisdictions, so each event names the law against which it is to be read and leaves the conclusion to whoever is entitled to draw it.

Shared by every event

Each DADE event is a Security Event Token (SET, RFC 8417) carried over the Shared Signals Framework. The event types live under https://schemas.openid.net/secevent/dade/event-type/, and every one of them can carry these common claims in addition to its own.

ClaimReqMeaning
governing_lawRecommendedThe law against which this event's consequence is to be evaluated: jurisdiction (ISO 3166-2 or -1 alpha-2) and as_at (a date). as_at is not redundant with the timestamp, for two reasons: an amendment can take effect retroactively, so the law as at a past date is not fixed merely because the date has passed; and a jurisdiction can hold two rules in force at once and select between them by the instrument's age rather than the event's, in which case reading its law “as of today” gives the wrong test for part of the population.
initiating_authorityRecommendedWho declared the transition. The weight a Receiver gives an event depends substantially on this.court registrar notary clinician agency principal custodian claimant operation-of-law
canonical_roleOptionalThe role held or claimed, from a cross-jurisdiction vocabulary, so that an executor, a liquidator and a Nachlassverwalter line up as one role.
evidenceOptionalSupporting evidence, using the evidence structures of OpenID Connect for Identity Assurance. Its document, electronic_record and vouch types already cover a death certificate, a register entry and a third party attesting to standing.
effect_unspecifiedOptionalThe Transmitter asserts the fact and expressly declines to characterise its legal effect. A Receiver MUST NOT infer a consequence the Transmitter has declined to assert.
event_timestampOptionalWhen the transition took effect in law, as distinct from when it was recorded. A death registered three days late carries the earlier time.
supersedes / correctsOptionalThe jti of an earlier SET this one replaces, or corrects and withdraws. A Receiver that acted on a corrected event SHOULD unwind that action so far as it is able.
reason_admin / reason_userOptionalLocalized messages keyed by BCP 47 language tag. reason_user is usually omitted here — the subject is dead.

Subjects

RFC 9493 defines no Subject Identifier Format for a person who has died, and the formats it does define fit badly: an email or phone_number identifier for a decedent is both likely to be reassigned and unusually sensitive. Draft 00 adds a principal format with an opaque principal_ref, scoped per Transmitter–Receiver pair, and an optional jurisdiction.

The subject of every event is the principal — the person whose death, capacity or affairs it concerns — so a Receiver can correlate the whole sequence on sub_id alone. A holder travels in the event body, not as the subject.

Facts, not effects

A court appoints a conservator over the property of someone who had granted a power of attorney. Across seven US states that one event has five different effects on the existing power: it continues; it terminates; the court allocates functions between the two; the conservator acquires the principal's own power to revoke it; or the power is suspended and later reinstated if capacity returns.

An event asserting "the power of attorney is terminated" is therefore wrong in five of the seven. One asserting "a conservator was appointed, under the law of Iowa, as at this date" is right in all of them.

A second case explains the date. Colorado runs two durability tests at once, selected by the age of the instrument: the current default for a power created after 1 January 2010, and a superseded magic-words section — still in force — for one created before it. Knowing the jurisdiction is not enough; a Receiver has to know as of when.

authority_status: reinstated capacity_status: restored record_status: withdrawn
  In spec (draft 00)   Candidate (not specified) response a Receiver action the profile anticipates response whether it is available at all depends on the governing law